Which of the following reflects specific jurisdiction?

Specific jurisdiction refers to a court's authority to hear a case based on the defendant's activities that are directly connected to the lawsuit. When assessing whether specific jurisdiction exists, courts typically evaluate whether the defendant has engaged in purposeful activities within the state that give rise to the legal claim.

In this context, when considering in-state activities related to the claim against the defendant, it emphasizes the direct connection between the defendant’s actions and the lawsuit. For instance, if a defendant conducts business or commits a tort specifically linked to the forum state, it establishes the necessary relationship for the court to exert jurisdiction over the defendant in that state.

In contrast, an overall business strategy broadly reflects a company’s operations and intentions but does not provide the specific connection necessary for establishing jurisdiction over a particular claim. The forum state where the defendant resides pertains more to general jurisdiction unless the current case is related to the defendant’s activity in that state. Annual revenues from the state, while indicative of business presence, do not necessarily demonstrate a direct connection to the specific claim at issue.