Which of the following factors is NOT considered when evaluating personal jurisdiction?

When evaluating personal jurisdiction, courts focus on establishing a connection between the defendant and the forum state. Key factors include the location of the defendant's business, the nature of the claims against the defendant, and the contacts established with the forum state. These elements help determine whether the court has a valid basis to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant.

In this context, the defendant's past criminal record is not relevant to personal jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is concerned with the defendant's activities and connections to the forum that would justify the state's legal authority to adjudicate matters related to the defendant. Criminal history does not typically inform or influence the jurisdictional inquiry, as it is not indicative of the defendant's interactions or associations with the forum state in the context of civil proceedings. Therefore, this factor does not play a role in the evaluation of personal jurisdiction.