What is a notable jurisdictional approach that has emerged due to e-commerce?

The notable jurisdictional approach that has emerged due to e-commerce involves considering online transactions as potential bases for jurisdiction. This reflects the evolving nature of commerce, where the traditional notions of physical presence do not always apply. When a seller engages in online transactions, they can reach customers across different states, and courts have recognized that these actions can establish a connection with the customer's jurisdiction.

This means that if a seller conducts significant business online or engages with customers in a certain state through their website, they may be subject to the jurisdiction of that state's courts. The reasoning behind this approach is that online sales can create sufficient minimum contacts with the state, allowing it to exercise personal jurisdiction over the seller.

In contrast, other approaches, such as prohibiting out-of-state sales, exclusively allowing jurisdiction in the seller's home state, or restricting jurisdiction to physical storefronts, do not adequately reflect the realities of e-commerce. They can hinder the growth of online businesses and do not align with the principles established by landmark cases such as International Shoe Co. v. Washington, which emphasize the importance of minimum contacts in establishing personal jurisdiction.