In McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., what was the basis for establishing specific jurisdiction?

The basis for establishing specific jurisdiction in McGee v. International Life Insurance Co. stems from the significant connection the defendant had with the state through a contractual agreement. In this case, the insurance company sold a policy to a resident of California, which created a direct relationship, thereby allowing California to assert jurisdiction over the company. This relationship was deemed sufficient because the transaction took place in the state, leading to the conclusion that the defendant could reasonably foresee being brought into court in that state due to the obligations arising from the contract.

The relevance of this case lies in the broader principle that specific jurisdiction can arise when a defendant’s activities in a forum state are such that they should reasonably anticipate being brought into court there. In essence, the contractual relationship created a substantial connection to California, justifying the exercise of jurisdiction.

Options that suggest the defendant's physical presence or an office in the state are not necessary for establishing specific jurisdiction, as the key factor in this case was the direct connection through the contract. Similarly, the residency of the parties isn't a prerequisite for asserting jurisdiction, as a contract with a resident is sufficient to establish the connection needed for personal jurisdiction.