How can social media usage affect personal jurisdiction?

The correct choice is based on the concept that social media usage can create substantial contacts with the forum state, which is a key factor in establishing personal jurisdiction. When an individual or entity actively engages on social media platforms and targets users located in a specific state, this interaction can demonstrate that they have purposefully availed themselves of the privileges and protections of that state's laws.

These substantial contacts are essential for meeting the criteria required for personal jurisdiction, especially in cases where the jurisdiction is based on specific jurisdiction. Specific jurisdiction arises when a party's activities in the forum state give rise to the legal claims being asserted. If social media engagement is directed at residents of the state or results in transactions that occur within the state, it can provide the necessary basis for a court in that state to assert jurisdiction over that party.

The other options do not directly address established legal principles related to personal jurisdiction. Advertising within the forum state through social media is a part of the broader category of creating contacts, but it does not fully encapsulate the concept of substantial contacts themselves. Remote communication can certainly play a role in how interactions occur but does not on its own establish jurisdiction without the requisite substantial contacts. Lastly, while advancements in technology allow for remote hearings, that does not inherently relate