Can a court assert personal jurisdiction over a corporation?

A court can indeed assert personal jurisdiction over a corporation, and this is established based on where the corporation is incorporated or where it conducts significant business activities. The rationale behind this is tied to the concepts of fairness and justice in legal proceedings, ensuring that a corporation can be held accountable in jurisdictions where it has chosen to operate or engage in significant connections.

When a corporation is incorporated in a state, it has submitted itself to that state's jurisdiction. Similarly, if a corporation engages in business activities in a different state, it creates sufficient contacts with that state, allowing for jurisdiction there as well. This principle stems from the need for a legal system to have the authority to call upon entities that benefit from the economic opportunities available within that jurisdiction.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the law surrounding personal jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is not exclusive to individuals; corporations can also be subject to it. Likewise, a corporation can be sued based on its presence and activities, regardless of whether it has a physical presence in the forum state, as long as there are sufficient contacts. Lastly, the notion that corporations can only be sued in their state of incorporation is incorrect because jurisdiction can also be established in states where the corporations conduct business or have other significant ties.